Here is a 3-minute journey through the last 250 years of our history showing the global growth of transportation & communication networks.

A 3-minute journey through the last 250 years of our history, from the start of the Industrial Revolution to the Rio+20 Summit. The film charts the growth of humanity into a global force on an equivalent scale to major geological processes. 


The film was commissioned by the Planet Under Pressure conference, London 26-29 March, a major international conference focusing on solutions. 
planetunderpressure2012.net

The film is part of the world's first educational webportal on the Anthropocene, commissioned by the Planet Under Pressure conference, and developed and sponsored by 
www.anthropocene.info

The secret inspiration of Edvard Munch's "The Scream" is revealed…we now know why the terrified man is in shock: $119,922,500

Thescream
Norwegian painter Edvard Munch became the most expensive artist at auction Wednesday when his 1895 pastel of a terrified man clutching his cheeks along an Oslo fjord, "The Scream," sold for $119.9 million at Sotheby's—the most ever paid for a work of art at auction.

The purchase surpasses the $106.5 million spent two years ago for Pablo Picasso's 1932 portrait of his mistress, "Nude, Green Leaves and Bust," as well as Alberto Giacometti's earlier record of $104.3 million for his 1960 spindly bronze sculpture, "Walking Man I."

"The Scream" carries its own mystique, having come from the collection of Petter Olsen, a Norwegian real-estate developer and shipping heir who grew up with the work in the living room of his childhood home. His father, Thomas Olsen, a neighbor of Munch's in the small Norwegian town of Hvitsten, bought the work from the German coffee magnate who likely commissioned it. During World War II, Mr. Olsen said his family hid the work along with dozens of other Munch artworks in a hay barn to protect them from the Nazis, who were destroying artworks they deemed degenerate. Mr. Olsen has said he offered up "The Scream" now in order to fund a museum of Munch's work in Hvitsten to open next year.

The third in a series created between 1893 and 1910, Sotheby's version was created with pastel on rough board and offered in its original frame, which is inscribed with an 1892 poem Munch wrote that inspired the work. In the poem, he says he was walking beside that fjord when he sensed "an infinite scream passing through nature."
Ob-st153_2screa_g_201204262003
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304743704577380681484724806.html

Is Japan The Most Creative Country? Adobe thinks so...

Media_httpeditorialde_pehxa

A recent study by Adobe has revealed Japan as the most creative country. But the Japanese and Americans do not see the Japanese as creative; Americans believe that America is the most creative.

In an interview of 5,000 adults across the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France and Japan, Tokyo is found to be the most creative city, with New York coming in second.

The study also shows that 80% of people feel that unlocking creativity is critical to economic growth; but only 1 in 4 people feel like they’re living up to their own creative potential.

75% of respondents said they are under growing pressure to be productive rather than creative—the lack of time being the biggest barrier to creativity.

Most of those surveyed feel that creativity is stifled by education systems, and many believe creativity is taken for granted.

Additional InfoGraphics at above link.

20 Odd Questions answered by Sir Richard Branson...

Media_httpsiwsjnetpub_cskev

Great list of 20 questions and honest replies...my favorites:

"There's no better gift than a photograph. Stephen Colbert recently sent an enlarged, framed photo featuring him dressed as me, vacuuming, with a nude model on his back. It was similar to a photo of me kiteboarding, and it was gratefully received because the fire on Necker burned down my office and with it all my notebooks and photographs."

"I've spent a lifetime trying to set an example to get the necktie abolished. I mean, I just find it so sad going somewhere like Japan, where they're all wearing suits. You look at these lovely pictures of them 100 years ago in their beautiful robes, and you think, 'how on earth did the necktie ever catch on?' I just find them uncomfortable and restricting. I think it's people who run departments of companies, who've had to suffer all their lives and are damned if the next generation isn't going to suffer, too."

"I hate being in hotels with a thousand rooms. And I personally don't like going into hotels where you've got formal check-in desks. I'd much rather come and sit on the couch and be checked in that way, or ideally be checked in before I've actually gotten to the hotel."

Read the rest at above link.

The 'New' American Minimalism is here to stay...

Media_httpswsjnetpubl_zhakh

From the Wall Street Journal:

IT'S A PHENOMENON AS OLD as America itself—our taste in furniture, as in fashion, is fickle. In the early 19th century, the winged pedestals of English Regency were brushed aside for the sleeker lines of Grecian Plain. Our suburban forefathers moved Danish modern into the attic and trucked in lumbering Spanish revival. And today we're putting our playful blob lamps on eBay and returning to simple, locally made pieces.

Call it the New American Minimalism. It usurps our 2000s-era romance with confections perhaps best represented by the Dutch brand Moooi, which conjured up crocheted side tables and Louis-style chairs burned to a slight crisp. It also bears little resemblance to older minimalist vocabularies, like the colorful Memphis style that was parodied in the 1988 movie "Beetlejuice." Instead, honesty is now the policy: reserved shapes, natural materials, apparent construction and hand finishing.

Full article with additional photos at above link.

The new Apple headquarters project is moving ahead. Recent plans show fruit trees dotting the 175-acre site.

Apple-headquarters

When Steve Jobs described his childhood in California’s Santa Clara (now Silicon) Valley, he often mentioned the apricot orchards that made the area a kind of earthly paradise. So it’s fitting that one of the first things visitors will see at Apple’s new headquarters—the circular building designed by Foster and Partners on a 175-acre site in Cupertino—is an apricot grove...

Full article with additional resources at this link:

Just think: In 18 months Instagram's ROI per employee is $83,333,000 (or equal to monthly 'revenues' of $4,600,000 per employee).

Pastedgraphic-1

When word came that Instagram had been acquired by Facebook for $1 billion, the tweets came fast, and they were furious: “Delete ur instagram!! The Feds own it now!!” “I had a higher opinion of you Instagram.” “Soon as I delete my Facebook they decide to buy instagram #FML.”

To an outsider, the outrage was puzzling. A new (just 18 moths old with no revenue) very small company (12 +/- employees) that lets you share photos with friends and strangers (30,000,000 users) was purchased by a larger company (3,000 employees) that lets you share photos with 'friends' and strangers (850,000,000). This means that Facebook is paying InstaGram for around $33 per Instagram user. That's a fraction of the $118 that Facebook investors will be paying per Facebook user if the company gets its expected $100 billion valuation after going public. 

For Facebook, targeting Instagram makes sense. Its mobile photo-sharing tool is ugly and clunky; Instagram’s is pretty and seamless. With the purchase, Facebook upgraded a weak spot in its business. This kind of deal happens all the time in Silicon Valley—think Yahoo buying Flickr in 2005, or Google buying YouTube a year later...or AOL buying TIme Warner, Cisco buying FLIP...well, let's forget about the AOL and Cisco gig...

For Facebook, this isn’t just about improving its photo-sharing app. It’s about market domination. Facebook doesn’t want to be one among a number of options for sharing your personal content with friends and strangers. It wants to be the only option. Just as Google rakes in revenue by ruling search, Facebook’s business model depends on monopolizing sharing on the Web. Not just sharing status updates, or likes, or memes, or even photos—but sharing, as an activity. To secure that kind of ubiquity, Facebook will wield its pocketbook to take startups like Instagram out of play. If it doesn’t, someone else might scoop them up.

Facebook's Instagram acquisition also makes sense as an attempt to gain access to its users’ phones. The social network got huge on PCs—its website is the most heavily used in the world—but it will stay huge by colonizing smartphones. More than privacy concerns, antitrust lawsuits, or Google+, a failure to dominate mobile sharing is the one thing that could stall Facebook’s seemingly boundless growth.

Facebook was once a community, too. Now it is the all-seeing eye. Now, when you log into Instagram, a message pops up welcoming you to “a fun and quirky way to share your life through photos.” When you download Spotify, by contrast, you get a lengthy privacy policy, plus a message that tells you, “Dylan B., John C., and 162 others use Spotify.” That’s 162 other Facebook friends, of course—and by default, they can all see what you’re listening to.

Today Facebook has NO revenues from mobile. None. That’s amazing, since so many people, hundreds of millions of us, use Facebook on mobile clients.

That will change very quickly after the IPO. Instagram will play a huge role here, plus Facebook gets a very talented mobile development team (12...) that has built world-leading mobile apps on iOS and Android (which got a million users in its first day).

Let’s say that Facebook can turn on monetization on mobile clients. That could mean $500 million in revenue on first quarter, $700 on second, $900-$1 billion on third. Looking at it this way paying a billion for Instagram makes a LOT of sense.

Especially when you consider that the mobile team Facebook just acquired is going to be able to build a range of apps.

But that’s just the beginning. Remember, Facebook is a new media company: one where the media comes to you based on what it knows about you.

Plus, Instagram adds some important new pieces of data to the Facebook databases:

1. It knows who you like seeing photos from. 

2. It knows where you are when you shoot the photo (very important info for Facebook to know about you).

3. It shows a range of passions that you have. If you are a skiier, you take pictures of snow and skiing. If you are a foodie you take pictures of food at high-end restaurants. If you are into quilting, a lot of your photos will be of that. If you are into mountain biking, the same. Facebook’s databases need this info to optimize the media it will bring to you. This data is $$$$$. Imagine you’re a ski resort and want to reach skiiers, Instagram will give them a new way to do that, all while being far more targeted than Facebook otherwise could be.

4. Instagram will let Facebook develop a new kind of Open Graph advertising. One where Facebook will be able to offer mobile developers a lot of money in return for opening their apps up to Open Graph. Venture capitalists in Silicon Valley are slobbering over this new potential revenue stream, so having lots of VC buy-in (they just got a nice payday) will be very important. Imagine that Benchmark now “asks” all of its member companies to support such a new advertising scheme? This could result in billions of revenues for Facebook and member companies.

But Facebook doesn't need users. Facebook has users - some 850 million of them. Many feel that Facebook's growth potential is slowing, however the social network could scoop up another 100 million global users with its eyes closed over the next year, especially as its global expansion increases. Facebook is in the business of figuring out how to make money off those users. So far, Instagram represents more users, but not any more revenue.  And, Instagram appealed to 30 million users despite not being a part of Facebook—and perhaps because it wasn’t part of Facebook. And if that’s true, then Facebook may have a problem. 

Links: